Skewed penetration but straightforward strategy
There’s a lot of debate as to how one adjusts mobile penetration rates to properly size the actual market opportunity. But it’s not just about getting phones in the hands of the phone-less. It’s also about converting single SIM subs to dual, dual SIM subs to triple, etc. I have a gut feeling that expanding multi-SIM penetration (do I hear penetration rates of 250%?) could be a real growth area. But I’m not sure operators are actually addressing that particular opportunity.
I saw a Vodafone presentation recently that showed that in the UK, Germany and Spain, consumer subs had an average 1.19 SIMs each and business subs had an amazing 1.55 SIMs each on average. In fact, 12% of the business subs had 3 or more active SIMs. The consolidated figure, for consumer and business subs, was 1.22 SIMs per sub. With that knowledge, it's pretty simple math to work out the actual phone-less population.
Who are these phone-less people? My gran for one. My 2 year old for another. In other words, people who, if they did sign up for a mobile, would have such low ARPU that they'd be cost prohibitive to keep on the books.
So, mobile operators trying to build mobile market share have 2 options: Fight tooth and nail for churners - a pretty tough and expensive fight and does nothing to improve customer loyalty. Or they could target the multi-SIM market and build market share by increasing SIM penetration. I think multi-SIM presents a lucrative opportunity for some creative bundling. Particularly now that mobile operators are jumping into fixed line services.
I'm a multi-SIM guy and like me I think most multi-SIM folks are also multi-operator. So an interesting strategy could be for the operator to be the supplier for all my mobile comms needs: business 1, business 2, personal 1, etc....you get the picture. They’d be increasing the total comms market by getting more SIMs in more peoples’ hands which should lead to increased usage, but more importantly they’re locking me in by bundling multiple accounts at a good price. Mobile number portability is still a pretty painful process, and that’s just when I want to move a single number. If I had to move 2 numbers, I’d probably think twice before going there.
Add to the bundle my home broadband service and my switching costs suddenly skyrocket. I'm pretty much hooked in for life.
2 comments:
Let's count my SIM's I use: one for business, one in the car, one for private use and one for mobile Internet access. Makes 4 in total. Quite frankly, my greatest wireless wish is to only have one to carry around. From a technical standpoint it's possible. So my biggest wish for 2007 to operators: Forget about multi SIM and give me an offer that combines reasonable prices for business, private and Internet use. I know, it won't happen...
Good point Martin. The technology is definitely there to decouple the SIM from the account. I'm sure IMS does this. So, to restate my proposed strategy then: The operator should focus on the "multi-account market" and grow market share by increasing the number of accounts that subs have.
Regarding 1 SIM vs multiple SIMS, in the end it becomes a user preference thing. Some people want multiple phones, others want just one. But, the value for the operator is in the fact that I have multiple accounts with them. And they have the opportunity to lock me in even more with larger bundles.
Me personally, I like having 2 phones. I have a (large) N80 for business and a small sony-ericsson for personal which fits nicely in my pocket when I'm out on the town. But there's no reason why both phones couldn't be on the same account with the same operator with an IMS network intelligently offering me services based upon whether I'm a consumer or business user at that point in time.
Thanks for the comment.
Post a Comment